19/04/2011 09:36:27
ciao, Penso Takiro stato un rovesciamento di Goldrake nella sua announci Versione 1 solo Goldrake ha ganci sulle gambe e la versione 1 dx non . Per me è certo che è vero il contrario, cosa ne pensi? grazie
|
19/04/2011 11:48:42
monstr se devi parlare di versioni di goldrake sul forum fallo come ti ho consigliato ma senza riferimenti a mie vendite visto che è vietato dal regolamento.
txs
|
19/04/2011 12:25:12
Pelea, pelea......
|
19/04/2011 12:31:34
Poi se scrivi in inglese è meglio....
|
19/04/2011 13:20:32
bello comunque il traduttore di Yoda.
|
19/04/2011 13:25:02
|
19/04/2011 13:26:57
So i want to have the confirmation that the version solo doesn`t have the red part of legs with a hook and the version dx YES.
|
19/04/2011 13:35:34
In past decades surfaced a lot of "solo box" Grendizer, even with red plastic foot hooks, so it seems that Popy released both versions.
|
19/04/2011 13:40:41
for me it s mix, but anyway.. in the version 1 DX , i always saw legs with hook, and that logical.
|
19/04/2011 13:47:08
They were toys, so in the Popy factories every "mix" was possible. In past decades I collected almost every possible original factory variant (and some prototypes, too) and I personally think so.
|
19/04/2011 14:07:52
i am agree in some case, but not in this one because japanes are logical...and i never saw a version one dx without hook..
|
19/04/2011 14:31:51
O.K. so, once again, WHY you ask, if you don`t mind a thing about the answers? This is the very last time I will loose time in replying to your silly questions. Bye.
|
19/04/2011 14:32:40
Je ce crois pas que les Japoneis sont si logiques: moi, j`ai vu plusieurs fois, un Goldorak sans crochet. En 1970 ils n`etaient si precis comme tu dis.
|
19/04/2011 14:37:59
|
19/04/2011 14:53:22
Bat you have a pb è i never ask YOU to answer, it s a forum where we give our opinion and communicate on our expenriences, you give me yours ok and so? i just have to take it like that i can t discuss?! but who do you think you are è how could talk to me like that? pffff poor man
|
19/04/2011 15:08:46
pffff mi ci mancava
|
19/04/2011 15:13:22
|
19/04/2011 15:27:34
ah for one time you say something con significato ` `
|
19/04/2011 15:30:17
Oui, like " pffff ", you mean.
Take it easy
Relax....
|
19/04/2011 15:47:15
non ho capito Je ne comprenais pas i did not undertood 31169. 12399. 29702. 35299. 12375. 12390. 12356. 12394. 12356. Un? nuk e kuptoj Nu am ?n 355.eles 25105. 19981. 26126. 30333. Ik begreep niet Non intellexi 1500. 1488. 1492. 1489. 1504. 1514. 1497. Eu n?o entendi 3612. 3617. 3652. 3617. 3656. 3648. 3586. 3657. 3634. 3651. 3592.
|
19/04/2011 15:49:42
|
19/04/2011 16:24:06
I honestly agree with Bat70. What`s the aim of the threadò If you want to argue with Takiro, use the thread of his item on sale. If you`d like to have an interesting discussion about real or presumed Grendizer versions, that`s the place, but you have to be able to accept any opinion, not just the one you`re expecting to receive.
|
19/04/2011 16:25:56
"Je ne comprenais pas" è al livello di Salvatore. Non cadiamo in basso con critiche al suo italiano dai...
|
19/04/2011 16:34:43
ho usato lo stesso traduttore... prenditela con il software..
|
19/04/2011 17:06:02
quale italiano è
ahhh dici lo yodese
|